Your cart is empty.
Your cart is empty.Product Description
William Stoker
Reviewed in the United States on April 25, 2025
I got this for my son, who collects Pokemon cards. He's been keepig them in a ziploc bag, which is obviously not a great solution. He was SO excited to put all of his cards in this binder. The slots were a good fit for Pokemon cards, and there was enough space for his whole collection. It's nice that it has a zipper around the outside to keep things contained. I haven't ever had a binder like this to compare the quality to, but it seems sturdy enough for the job. It's a nice looking black pleather, and I think it's decent value for the price.Here's the scale I'm using for my ratings:⭐️ 1 star= Nope! I not recommended. It’s poorly made, or not what it’s listed to be.⭐️⭐️ 2 stars = Has some redeeming qualities, would not buy again.⭐️⭐️⭐️ 3 stars = Meh. It's passable. Might not be worth the price.⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ 4 stars = Good, but there’s something off⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ 5 stars = Yes! Exactly what it should be.
Jeff
Reviewed in the United States on April 23, 2025
The case is nicely padded and sturdy with nice zipper and a hanging/carry loop. Comes with lots of double sided loading sleeves. 3ring loops are sturdy but 1 of my 2 complaints. It's a full curve metal ring instead of having a flat edge and the binder being on only the back so the top can fold over. The way this is, once fully loaded with cards the sleeves inner edge will be reaching or stretching. The sleeves do have a bit extra space to help that curving not bend cards but have to close carefully once filled.2nd, I like the amount the double sided sleeve holds but I want to see the back of my sports cards without needing to pull the card out.
Space Man
Reviewed in the United States on April 22, 2025
Normally, I do not like ringed binders OR 3x3 card formats OR top-loading sleeves (I prefer 4x4, ringless, side-loading binders). So why did I choose this one? Rittenhouse Star Trek TNG Archives and Inscriptions cards. The main cast cards come in 18 variations per card and the rest of the cards come in 9 variations per card, so I needed a 3x3 format. But ringless 3x3 binders tend to only go up to 300-500 cards max and i needed space for an over 600 card base set in multiples of 9, so here we are. I must say, as far as 3 ring binders go with top-loading sleeves, this one is excellent. The look, the feel, the number of cards it can hold are all solid.I don't like that you cannot sleeve the cards first from above and then place them into these sleeves, but I expected that, as this seems to always be the case with these 3x3 top-loading ring binder sheets. It is not as much of an issue here, though, since the binder can be zipped up to protect the cards inside from dust and hopefully discoloration.So, for general use, I would still go with a ringless 4x4 side-loading binder any day of the week, but for Rittenhouse Archives and Inscriptions cards, this binder is the way to go.
Peter Simpson
Reviewed in the United States on April 20, 2025
I am not a card collector, so I didn't get this binder for that purpose. I wanted a professional looking binder that could hold papers when I walk into professional environments. This thing turned out to be almost perfect for my needs.It comes with a ton of sheets to hold cards. I removed those and replaced them with plastic dividers that have paper holding pockets. That is exactly what I wanted.The material of the exterior sort of looks like tightly woven nylon, but I don't think it is. It actually seems like a textured plastic that will hold up nicely.The zipper is of good quality.There is a strap handle that seems pretty useless for my purposes, so I will likely just cut that off.All in all, this is a well made product.
Sean Aguayo
Reviewed in the United States on April 19, 2025
This is an Amazon Vine review, I selected the card case from the review program options. I play MTG, currently have a card case but saw this and reasoned I could give it to my nephew.The reason for the 4 star is the case is good, not the best, not the worst, I would say a little above average. The price of $20 at the time of review is not what I would pay myself, given the quality. Again, this is not bad, not at all, it will do its job, but I think this is around a $10 to a $12 binder.It comes with sleeve sheets, they're okay, not great, but I didn't do any stress test or anything. They will do the job, they hold MTG standard sized, single sleeved cards, they don't slide out. They feel thin, I can sense they can rip from the the ring binder after use or if you're being rough with them. There are 39, maybe 40 sheets. 9 slots, both sides, top loads.The three ring binder does not have a tab or a button to open/close so that could be an issue if you're trying to open them. If you're careful, it will be fine. Easy to move the sheets back and forth in the rings, no bends, and easy to slide the cards in and out. Felt lining of the inside case and case comes with a handle. I like the handle.All in all, it's good for what it is, definitely will do the trick, but I think it should be lower priced. If it was around the $10 mark, I would give it 5 stars and would highly recommend as a budget binder for your collection. I cannot recommend this to a serious collector with average priced ($5 -$15) cards, or even a kid who will be rough with it as it does not seem that it will hold up to a kid who's not careful and gentle with it (when I was a kid I played with my pokemon cards unsleeved in the 90's, we were wild).Outside material seems good, I haven't tested the water resistance of it, but I do like the handle and there were no deformities in the shipping, package container, or the product itself
Corey
Reviewed in the United States on November 1, 2024
Fits plenty of cards and the outer case looks pretty good.
Erica
Reviewed in the United States on October 10, 2024
Bigger than I expected which was awesome . It’s water proof and definitely worth the money!
Recommended Products