I've been using the SanDisk Extreme PRO 32GB for a while now, and it delivers exactly as promised! The 95MB/s read speed ensures quick transfers, and it's perfect for shooting in Full HD and even 4K without lag. This SD card is fast, durable, and reliable, making it an excellent choice for photographers and videographers.I’ve used it in my DSLR and action camera, and it handles burst shooting and high-resolution videos without any issues. No data corruption, no lag—just smooth performance. Definitely worth the price!

I use these cards with a Nikon DSLR, primarily for video production, and am impressed with how fast they write and play back. They also come with a free download of data recovery software (one year time limit), which I'll use only if I have a failure. (No telling how much information SD will want in exchange for "free" software.) So far, I've never had an SD brand card failure.

Works great with my Zoom h8 and Podtrack P4.

buena y rápida

I bought two of these and one "Transcend 32GB SDHC Class 10 UHS-1 (TS32GSDU1)" While Transcend was 2.5 times cheaper it was also considerably slower. The speed differences I got inside my Fujifilm X-T1 were noticeable when shooting in burst mode and in previews. With Sandisk you shoot a photo and press play and it almost instantly shows up, where as with Transcend it takes a bit longer. X-T1 has a good buffer so for single-shot mode you probably won't see much difference. But in Burst mode the difference is very noticeable. With Sandisk it writes the buffer so quickly that even if you filled it up completely you would still be able to get a shot quick enough not to miss a scene. With Transcend I felt like if I was in a situation where I need to act quickly, there could be a chance that I would miss some shots, especially because the buffer is so good that you can get carried away sometimes and then waaaait till it writes it out. If you have a camera with smaller buffer size, like Fujifilm X-T10 for example, speed will be even more important for you.In short, the speeds I got from this card (used with Fujifilm X-T1) are what I needed. Slower than this, I would feel lacking with possibility of lost shots. Faster than this well, wouldn't hurt of course, but I really doubt it would affect my shooting.A very nice site I found (not sure if I can paste address here) if you google for "Fastest SD cards for Fuji X-T10" first hit: cameramemoryspeed compares various cards. It really made up my mind about getting this card. There are other more expensive cards by Sandisk, but it seems they're only a little bit faster when it comes to Write speed (and nobody cares about read-speed).Other thoughts:If you're considering getting larger capacity cards check the size of your photos. I only shoot RAW and X-T1 makes them rather large (~32MB) and some people complain about that. I don't, because I think it's the reason I get instant preview of 1920x1280. This preview is embedded inside the RAW file so you don't need an extra JPEG file for preview (although there's an option to do that in the camera and I've heard many people doing that... not sure why they do that as the confusion it causes, gives me a BIG headache) Any FujiFilm RAW file I click on, instantly loads the image as though it was a JPEG. I use AcDsee v2.42, amazing little program... they're on version 19 now introducing lots of features that someone who doesn't have Lightroom might find useful :)For me 900+ photos on a single 32GB cards is a good compromise of safety Vs. convenience. Convenience of not having to replace cards too often, Vs. not having too many photos in one basket. I had a Sandisk card fail on me one time. It was 32GB and I shot the last image as the camera showed card-full message I took it out and wasn't able to access it since. 16GB is probably even better size to use as it can still fit 450+ RAW images, but if I force myself to be more responsible and transfer cards to the computer every day... anyway, I HIGHLY *don't* recommend getting larger than 32GB capacity cards (for photos) because they do fail occasionally and 64GB can fit a lot of tears!

Empaque sellado original nuevo de lujo, llegó antes de lo previsto muchas gracias, recomendado al 100% pedí 5 jejeje y llegaron todas.

The media could not be loaded.

Dopo aver fatto i primi test in burst ed in trasferimento, sono rimasto deluso: le prestazioni di "scatto a raffica" sono esattamente identiche alla mia vecchia Sandisk Extreme III (30Mb/s), mentre quelle di lettura e scrittura sulla scheda da pc si discostavano di poco:Test con 1,9GB Mb-> lettura da Sandisk Extreme III: 1m 27s-> lettura da Sandisk Ultra Pro: 1m 27s-> scrittura su Sandisk Extreme III: 1m 50-> scrittura su Sandisk Ultra Pro: 1m 33sIl motivo è presto spiegato: per poter arrivare a sfruttare i 95Mb/s dichiarati, la fotocamera ed il lettore di SDHC devono supportare la nuova interfaccia UHS-I, il che riguarda un'esigua nicchia di (nuovissimi) prodotti.Così, convinto nel perseverare nel mio intento di sfruttare la super velocità della scheda, ho acquistato un SD Reader della Sonnet per MacBook Pro (si alloggia nella porta CardExpress), che sfrutta l'interfaccia UHS-I, ed ecco i risultati:-> lettura su Sandisk Ultra Pro: 37s-> scrittura su Sandisk Ultra Pro: 40sInsomma, il prodotto è ottimo, ma bisogna accertarsi di disporre di uno strumento che sia in grado di sfruttare la nuova interfaccia UHS-I.Di Nikon credo sia in grado di sfruttarla solo la D7000 al momento.Con tutte le altre fotocamere (che supportino le SDHC) è compatibile, ma va alla stessa velocità di quelle che trasferiscono 30/45 Mb/s (e costano la metà).AGGIORNAMENTO 16/10/2013a più di un anno dall'acquisto vorrei sottolineare quanto sia soddisfatto della SD Ultra Pro, e di quanto sia enorme la differenza di tempo nella copia su computer di sessioni di fotografia per chi, come me, scatta in RAW + JPEG.Come descritto sopra, l'SD Reader della Sonnet che ho acquistato per poter sfruttare l'interfaccia UHS-I della Ultra Pro si è rivelato un ottimo investimento per poter beneficiare di questa ultra-velocità;quando mi capita di utilizzare SD non UHS-I la lentezza nella copia di 5/6 Giga di foto è aberrante!

Qualitativ hochwertige SD-Karte. Die Karte ist sehr schnell und äußerst zuverlässig, so wie man es von SanDisk gewohnt ist. Ich habe bereits die Version mit 45MB/s in Gebrauch, und mir jetzt diese Karte für meine Sony Alpha 77 gekauft. Die Geschwindigkeit habe ich nicht gemessen, aber sie ist problemlos in der Lage, selbst die relativ großen Datenmengen, die mit einer 24MP-Kamera bei Aufnahme im Modus (RAW+JPEG) anfallen (etwa 30-40MB pro Bild) schnell wegzuspeichern (sie schafft dann etwa 2 Bilder pro Sekunde, man hat also einen leichten Geschwindigkeitsverlust gegenüber der "langsamen" Serienbildaufnahme mit 3 Bildern pro Sekunde - allerdings erst, nachdem der Kameraspeicher vollgeschrieben ist). Nimmt man nur in JPEG auf, kann man höhere Bildraten erreichen, da dann nicht so viel Daten pro Bild anfallen. Ich habe nicht mitgestoppt, aber es dauert in etwa 15 sec. bis ein voller Kameraspeicher komplett weggespeichert ist, somit ist man also für alle Eventualitäten gerüstet.Fazit:Für schnelle, hochauflösende Kameras sowie für HD-Videokameras die perfekte Speicherkarte. Nicht ganz billig, aber definitiv ihr Geld wert. (Wenn man eine entsprechende Kameraausrüstung benutz, dann hat man wahrscheinlich sowieso bereits (mehrere) tausend Euro in diese investiert, und da sollte man nicht an ein paar Euro mehr für die Speicherkarte knausern.)Klare Kaufempfehlung