Jennings
Reviewed in the United States on December 11, 2024
I used this cable one time on my trail cameras and both ends pulled from the connectors due to very poor crimping. I have had other brands in use for several years with absolutely zero issues. Ridiculous quality to say the least! Of course the window for return closed 2 weeks ago!
alec
Reviewed in the United States on October 29, 2024
Seems very high quality and durable
Eddy
Reviewed in the United States on January 19, 2024
This is a review of the WIZACE 3ft. N Male to SMA Male Pure Copper Low Loss Coaxial Cable. Right from the start I was impressed with the coax as it is very sturdy and the RF connectors are affixed to the cable really well and look to be durably made to last a long time. Frankly, I was impressed and pleasantly surprised how nicely they are assembled. Since looks can be deceiving, I wanted to do a pre-post test comparing the new WIZACE cable with the coax cable it was intended to replace. So, before swapping out the old cable with the WIZACE 3ft. coax I took a few readings (see photos; Old test set-up showing a voltage Standing Wave ratio of 1.58 to 1, WIZACE Test Set-up cable showing a voltage Standing Wave ratio of 1.09 to 1, and WIZACE Cable Terminated in a 50 Ohm load etceteras). My older, shorter, coax was used to test the resonance of an antenna with a Nano VNA (Small Vector Network Analyzer) (again see photos). I confirmed that the WIZACE 3 ft. coax was a great cable that also had greater accuracy. I hope this review is helpful in your decision making.
Chevelle
Reviewed in the United States on April 14, 2024
It works like a champ ! Package was in a top of the line (Gucci) almost bag was swifter then a DQ chili cheese dog running it's course .... Brb darn chilly dog ..where was I o yea fast shipping but for sure good cell phone booster Cord ! Gotcha 1 !!!
No one of any importance
Reviewed in the United States on December 7, 2023
I ordered the 15 Ft cable and after looking at the spec sheet I did not hold out much hope.But after testing boy I was in for a nice surprise, this cable is better than its specs.The frequency rating of this cable is only 5 GHz and it is a little more than 3 DBm down at this point and that is just fine.I tested the cable from 10 MHz to 20 GHz and found the results to be very useable for lab work.Here is a list of my results using a calibrated HP 83712a @ 0 DBm and a HP 70k Spectrum Analyzer.20 GHz -10.22 DBm15 GHz -8.38 DBm10 GHz -5.42 DBm5 GHz -3.88 DBm2.5 GHz -2.18 DBm1.0 GHz -1.73 DBm500 MHz -1.4 DBm250 MHz -0.53 DBm100 MHz -0.48 DBm50 MHz -0.33 DBm10 MHz 0.00 DBmAs always there is some uncertainty in any measurements, so your results may vary.Overall, I found this cable to be good for use in RF work and a fair price for Amazon.
Michael B
Reviewed in the United States on December 23, 2023
I'm noticing several cables being grouped in these ratings. So for reference, I'm reviewing a 25' SMA to Type N, S-MR240 coax.The Amazon page indicates this is "S-LMR240" but I think that is a typo - at least it should be. The indication printed ON the cable is "S-MR240" (No "L"). So I'm guessing this is a non-LMR 'standard' that is meant to compete with the LMR240. Measurement wise this certainly seems consistent. Both are 50 ohms and both have very consistent "stiffness". Using TDR techniques I measured the Velocity Factor to be 80.1%, whereas the typ spec for LMR240 is 84%.I ordered a 25ft length cable - but I received 26ft (exactly). Losses between 800MHz - 1GHz (NanoVNA) were -1.4db (vs. -2.34db for LMR240). Since I couldn't find any published specs for "S-MR240" it's hard to know how to reference it - but I think it's easy to conclude it's comparable with LMR240. That said this cable is significantly lower in cost (almost -40% less according to a quick search). I'd use it for my ham radio projects and would look for longer lengths to use as well.
krisp
Reviewed in the United States on December 16, 2023
This coaxial N to SMA jumper is 25 feet long and made of "S-LMR240" labeled 50 ohm coax. It is about the size of RG58, smaller than RG8X or 5D-FB cables. The connectors look well attached and are shrink wrapped. This would be a decent extension cable for receive contexts, such as for a GPS with a powered antenna or perhaps a cellular extender.
K1glassman
Reviewed in the United States on December 10, 2023
They accidently sent the wrong cable, but they made it right with no hassles. The right cable is a great with quality workmanship. I do recommend this seller and his products.