He estado usando el Seagate Barracuda ST1000DM003 en mi PC durante un tiempo y ha superado mis expectativas. Es perfecta para tareas cotidianas y almacenamiento de grandes cantidades de datos. Es bastante silencioso en su funcionamiento y no genera ruidos molestos, lo cual me gusta mucho. Además, responde bien cuando necesito acceder a archivos pesados. El espacio de 1 TB es ideal si no quieres estar constantemente preocupado por el almacenamiento. Lo he probado durante largas sesiones de uso y no he tenido problemas de fiabilidad ni de rendimiento. Si buscas un disco duro interno que ofrezca buen rendimiento y sea de confianza, el Seagate Barracuda es una opción muy sólida.

Seagate drives are in many macs/pcs so their reliability is as good as any. This one gave me the storage I wanted at a price that was highly competitive. Easy to install, it got me back up and running in no time. That's why it's highly recommended.

パソコンHDDが壊れたので交換用に購入しました。現状何も問題なく稼働しています。

I bought two of these a few weeks ago and I've really only used one of them to any extent. Genuinely new. original factory sealed anti-static wrapping with all the correct authentication labels and stickers.The seller packaged them very well with plenty of padding so they arrived in perfect condition.Quite simply: no problems. I've never had trouble with any Seagate ITB HDDs, in fact any new Seagate HDD I've owned and so far that continues to be true.Although the two Seagate HDDs received are as listed they're slightly different in design from the accompanying listing photos. The label in particular is a different colour and specifies it as a recently manufactured AF (Advanced Format) type. It should be good for any purposes a HDD might be required for.However one of the things I've had trouble with using another make of HDD, a WD, also specified as an AF type, is for cloning an existing Windows OS on an older HDD. It is a bit of mystery exactly why that is happening but it seems to be to do with the external USB enclosure I was using. There's some sort of USB incompatibility as the problem is resolved if you connect it up internally via SATA.I must make it clear this is only when it comes to this particular cloning task and is probably very niche.Anyway the point is I've not yet tried the Seagate AF ones for this purpose. So if that is what you are going to use them I can not confirm whether or not they're suitable. They work fine in an USB external housing for backup, storage or whatever. That I can confirm because it is what I've been doing with the one I've been using most.

I bought six of these drives in 2014 to build two systems running RAID 5 on the motherboard. The RAID system runs Intel Rapid Storage Technology. I have had no problems, issues, or known defects. I check the status of my drives once a month. These drives haven't had problems. Both systems are performing well.My wife and I are hard core technologists (combined 45 years) that have a healthy respect for failure rates, impending doom, and we implement cross redundant network backups. It's kind of like buying auto insurance for the accident you hope you never have. Still we do this as a policy.She lost a 2TB drive (not this Seagate drive) in a single point of failure setup. It cost us about $1700 to recover in a clean room environment. We thought we'd covered our backsides, but I guess not. Remember to read the reviews to see what others have uncovered on used drives, sold as new, or, mislabeled drives. Don't be afraid to chat with their tech support or return department. They'll probably be able to tell you more about the reliability of models they sell than anyone else. The sales folks are going to try to, well, sell you on what they have. I'm not saying they'd lie, but you may not get the whole truth.I have towers that have an abundance of air flow. Water coolers on the CPU's and motherboard apps that monitor temps. I clean filters about every 6 months. An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure.

Easy to install right out of the box. Plug and Play, was recognized right away. haven't had any problems in the time I've had this drive in operation. Very pleased so far.Seagate was the going drive even in the early 1980's. Long before Western Digital came along. I prefer Seagate over WD because of their long years of experience with Hard Drives and reliability. I have had too many WD drive fail on me.Fast Writes & Reads (176mb/184mb)- 2X1TB Raid 0 Performance (340mb/380mb)- Affordable- Reliable BrandOther Thoughts: Very impressed with the performance of this drives. It's amazing how much hard drives have improved over the years.I ran this on Raid 0 on a Mac Pro with a SATA II Interface and was surprised at the read and write performance.Now obviously an SSD is still going to be faster in many respects, but I honesty, I'm super happy I chose this over an SSD simply because of the storage space.I've owned an SSD, just so everyone knows. So I'm aware of the amazing speeds, but for those who are price conscious and need more storage this is a great alternative.

Hola, soy de México D.F.Compre el producto un domingo, y llego al dia siguiente, el lunes, fue demasiado rápido.El producto venia totalmente cerrado en su bolsa, y protejido por una cajita de carton, lo instale en mi computadora que por cierto es S-ATA, y el disco es S-ATA 3, le quedo perfectamente y es compatible en todo, (obvio no le saco todo lo que puede ofrecer este disco duro ya que mi compu es de menos calidad) instale el sistema operativo, y la verdad siento mi computadora mas rápida, trabaja excelente, y claro que volvere a comprar este producto para una nueva PC que comprare en un tiempo no muy lejano.Totalmete se lo recomiendo a las personas que lean mi comentario, no se arrepentiran, YO ESTOY FELIZ CON EL. =)

I ordered this drive to replace a failing internal drive in my late 2009 iMac. This was essentially a newer version of the internal drive. So far the drive has been a solid performer. It runs quiet and has given me no problems. The main reason I gave it four stars is because it seems to be running a few degrees warmer than the drive it replaced. If my sensor readings are correct I have seen this drive peak out at about 130º when the system was under a heavy load where the old drive peaked out at 120º. Higher temps always concern me. Since I did a clean install on the drive the OS itself is cleaner and without all the cruft left over from numerous uninstalls.The previous drive lasted about 4.5 years with fairly heavy usage. From what I have read Seagate drives have not been as reliable of late so I was a bit hesitant to buy another one. But so far I am happy with this one. It remains to be seen if it will be a reliable drive. If I have problems I will amend this review.

This hard drive works like a champ with my setup. NO glitches. It's a BARE drive so no manual, no screws for install and no software. Really, all you need are screws or a screwless bay. So save the money and get a bare drive and download whatever drivers or Seagate software you need before installing. This starts up anyway using Win 7 drivers. To Partition and Format the drive: Use Windows 7 Control Panel > Administration > Computer Management > Disk Management Utility to Partition and Format as you want. Instructions for partitioning/formatting are all over the web, but I use the ones from Windows Knowledge base on the Microsoft Website. Very clear. Also -- using the cache for performance settings.At the recommendation of others, I did a full format (vs quick format) after partitioning - no errors / bad sectors on any of the drives. This takes a LOT longer with 1TB and 2TB drives than the quick format option, but it thoroughly checks the drives so you know what you've got (or not got) up front. Figure a couple hours for 2TB drives or thereabouts.Before purchasing any of the Hard Drives for my new build, I thoroughly read all the reviews. This is the third of 3 Seagate 3.5" Bare Drives I've installed in my HAF X case. The Other Two are Seagate Barracuda "XT's" -- 2TB. All work great. While I "wanted" solid state drives, they are not practical from a cost standpoint for me because I do Video Editing and need so much hard drive space. Even 3TB isn't near enough yet. I decided to stick with one vendor -- and it was Seagate vs Western Digital for the internal hard drives for performance and reliability reasons, and because of the warranty periods. I've had both types of internal drives in the past. Only the Western Digital gave out, but that was also after a long time and heavy use. Not intended as a slam. Both brands are probably fine. Still the Barracuda XT's especially outperform the WD Caviar Blacks for the type of programs I run.I have installed and briefly read through all the Seagate software, but have taken it (and all other bloatware & unnecessary starup files) out of my startup sequence, which makes for very fast POST and Windows bootup of ~ 8 seconds on my Asus P8Z68-VPRO/Gen 3 motherboard/I72600K CPU. (That boot time is off the Seagate 2TB Barracuda XT boot drive with 64MB cache with NO overclocking.) Still, may use re-enable Seagate Tools software for backups vs Win7 and some of the other features that software offers. Very pleased so far with performance, speed, temps of these drives, and they are NOT noisy at all. In fact, very quiet.Last -- this 1TB drive is for a 6.0Gb/s SATA port, but just FYI -- it's backwards compatible with 3.0 Gb/s SATA ports and cables. I installed this drive on a 3.0 Gb/s SATA port using a 6.0Gb/s cable (only kind of SATA data cable I purchased) and it works just fine. That 3.0 Gb/s SATA "port speed" is really faster anyway than what any spinning hard drive can accomplish anyway and I've already used my two Z68 6.0 Gb/s SATA ports for the 2TB Barracuda XT's. Avoided using the Marvel 6.0 Gb/s controller SATA ports on the Mobo. Using the Z68 SATA ports instead -- too many people having problems with using both controllers at the same time, especially if they have a RAID setup (I don't). 3.0Gb/s connection is fast enough for now but by purchasing the 6.0Gb/s drives, may have some future capability compatibility at a minimum markup now.